top of page
Search

Which Property Investment is Best? A Guide to BTL, HMO, SA, and Social Housing

Writer's picture: George SamoilaGeorge Samoila

Investing in property is one of the most effective ways to grow wealth, but not all property investment strategies are created equal. The big question is: which strategy works best for you? Let’s break it down by comparing the main property investment options: Buy-to-Let (BTL), Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO), Serviced Accommodation (SA), and Social Housing. Each has its pros and cons, so let’s dive in.


1. Buy-to-Let (BTL)


BTL is the classic property investment strategy. You buy a property, rent it out to a tenant, and collect monthly rental income. Simple and effective.


Benefits:

Low hassle: A single tenant or family means fewer maintenance issues and fewer moving parts compared to other strategies.

Stable returns: BTL properties rented to long-term tenants provide predictable, consistent income.

Easier to manage: Especially if you work with letting agents or even social housing providers, who can take care of the day-to-day headaches.

Great for beginners: BTL is a straightforward entry point for new investors.


Downsides:

Tax changes: With recent reductions in mortgage interest tax relief and higher stamp duty for landlords, BTL is not as profitable as it once was—unless you know how to optimise.

Void periods: If your tenant moves out, there’s no income until you find a new one.


Best tip: In areas like Manchester and Liverpool, BTL properties leased to social housing providers can yield 6-10%, offer market rents, and remove the stress of finding tenants or dealing with maintenance.



2. Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO)


HMOs are properties rented out to multiple tenants, typically individuals sharing communal spaces like kitchens and bathrooms. For example, student housing or professional shared houses.


Benefits:

Higher yields: HMOs can offer returns of up to 12% in some areas, as you’re collecting rent from multiple tenants.

Demand: With the rising cost of living, more people are opting for shared housing, making HMOs highly sought-after.


Downsides:

Complex management: More tenants = more admin, maintenance, and potential disputes.

Regulations: Licensing requirements for HMOs are stricter, and you’ll need to comply with a long list of safety standards.

Voids: Even with five rooms, if two are empty, your cash flow takes a hit.


Best tip: Social housing providers are starting to lease HMOs for 3-5 years, covering voids and maintenance. This is a game-changer for reducing stress and boosting passive income.


3. Serviced Accommodation (SA)


Serviced accommodation, such as Airbnb or short-term lets, is growing in popularity. This strategy is all about renting a property to guests for short stays, like a hotel.


Benefits:

High income potential: SA properties can generate far more income than standard BTLs, especially in tourist hotspots or cities with high business travel demand.

Flexibility: You can use the property yourself between bookings if needed.

Tax perks: SA properties qualify for different tax rules, which can be more favourable than BTL.


Downsides:

Labour intensive: You’re essentially running a hospitality business. Think bookings, check-ins, cleaning, and guest management.

Seasonal income: Earnings can dip in off-peak months, so cash flow can be inconsistent.

High running costs: Cleaning, utilities, and furnishing eat into your profits.


Best tip: While SA can be lucrative, it requires time and effort. It’s best suited for hands-on investors or those with a reliable management company.




4. Social Housing


Social housing is often overlooked, but it’s one of the most stress-free and secure property investment options. You lease your property to a housing provider who rents it out to tenants in need (e.g., vulnerable groups, low-income families).


Benefits:

Guaranteed rent: Providers often pay you even if the property is empty. No more worrying about void periods.

No maintenance costs: Most social housing providers cover repairs and maintenance.

Hassle-free management: The provider handles tenants, so you don’t have to deal with late-night calls or tenant disputes.

Long-term leases: Leases typically last 3-5 years, making cash flow predictable and secure.


Downsides:

Rent caps: Social housing rents are sometimes lower than market rates (though some providers now pay full market rents).

Property requirements: Social housing providers often have specific criteria for property type and location.


Best tip: Social housing providers in the Northwest offer attractive yields for BTL (6-8%) and HMO (up to 12%), with long-term leases that make property investing truly passive.


Which Strategy is Best for You?


It all depends on your goals, experience, and time availability:

BTL: Great for beginners and those who want a simple, stable investment.

HMO: Perfect if you’re chasing high yields and can handle more management—or if you work with a social housing provider.

SA: Ideal for experienced investors who want high returns and don’t mind a hands-on approach.

Social Housing: The ultimate option for hands-off, secure income—especially for those prioritising low-risk, long-term investments.


Conclusion


If you’re looking for the most straightforward, low-stress option, BTL with a social housing lease is hard to beat. You’ll get consistent income without the typical headaches of being a landlord. For higher returns, HMOs can be a solid choice—especially when leased to social housing providers. SA is lucrative but requires more effort, and is best for those who enjoy the hospitality game.


Manchester and Liverpool remain prime investment areas, offering great yields and strong demand for all property types. Whether you’re just starting or looking to scale, there’s a strategy to match your ambitions.



23 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page